The Unexpurgated Case Against Woman Suffrage   By: Almroth Wright (1861-1947)

In "The Unexpurgated Case Against Woman Suffrage," Almroth Wright presents a thought-provoking examination of the arguments against granting women the right to vote. Published in 1913, the book delves into a topic that was highly contentious during the suffrage movement.

Wright begins by acknowledging the immense progress that women had made over the years in terms of education, employment, and legal rights. However, he questions whether political power is a necessary next step in their emancipation. With a clinical and somewhat detached tone, the author delves into the biological and physiological differences between men and women, arguing that these differences are significant obstacles to women's involvement in the political sphere.

One of the central arguments put forth by Wright is that women possess unique qualities and strengths that make them suited for roles other than political leadership. He contends that women's inherent nurturing and caring nature, necessary for the well-being of their families, would be compromised if they were to participate in the rough and often ruthless arena of politics. Wright fears that such a shift in women's roles may harm the family unit, which he views as the cornerstone of society.

Furthermore, the author expresses concerns that women's emotional predispositions, their supposed inability to separate logic from sentiment, may cloud their decision-making processes. Wright suggests that women might be more easily swayed by propaganda or emotional appeals, rather than making rational choices based on the broader needs of the nation.

Another significant aspect addressed by Wright is the potential damage that women's involvement in politics could inflict on their physical and mental well-being. He asserts that the strain of campaigning, engaging in debates, and enduring the pressures of public life may negatively impact women's health. The author's arguments heavily rely on biological determinism, emphasizing that women's bodies are more fragile and require special care and protection.

While reading this book, it is crucial to consider the wider historical context. "The Unexpurgated Case Against Woman Suffrage" raises important questions regarding gender roles and societal norms prevalent during the early 20th century. Almroth Wright's arguments reflect the opposition to suffrage that was staunchly held by some individuals at the time, although they have since been largely discredited.

In conclusion, "The Unexpurgated Case Against Woman Suffrage" presents a thought-provoking examination of the arguments opposing women's right to vote. Almroth Wright's work demonstrates the prevailing concerns and prejudices of his time, allowing readers to understand the complex debates surrounding the suffrage movement. However, it is essential to critically analyze the book's content through a contemporary lens, as gender equality and the empowerment of women have made significant strides since its publication.

First Page:

Argument that Woman Requires a Vote for her Protection Argument that Woman ought to be Invested with the Responsibilities of Voting in Order that She May Attain Her Full Intellectual Stature... Continue reading book >>